Home

>

Case Study

>

JDM Engine Direct

JDM Engine Direct · Automotive parts · Paid search · 2026

How JDM Engine Direct turned $97k of search spend into $1.42M

A high-ticket engine importer with a young conversion history. Rather than dress that up as a full-year comparison, here is what the account actually did: $97,245 in, $1,421,603 tracked back.

JDM Engine Direct

14.62×

return on ad spend

$97,245 spend → $1,421,603 revenue

The results, up top — every number is in the strip below

14.62×

return on ad spend

$97,245 spend → $1,421,603 revenue

$1.42M

tracked revenue

twelve months

840

tracked conversions

high-ticket engine orders

+90%

revenue on matched months

$288,948 → $548,470, Apr–Jul

+51%

conversions on matched months

201 → 303

Industry

Automotive parts & engine import

Location

United States

Channel

Google Ads (Search)

Services used

Paid search

Timeline

12 months — 2025–2026

01 — The challenge

Real revenue, but a measurement history too young to compare.

JDM Engine Direct sells imported Japanese engines nationally — a category where one sale can be worth thousands and buyers spend weeks comparing suppliers. The account was performing, but its verified conversion action only began recording in the middle of the prior year.

That creates a temptation we refused: comparing a full twelve months of tracked data against four months of it produces a spectacular, meaningless number. So the story is told two honest ways instead — absolute performance over the last twelve months, and growth only across the months both years actually cover.

“Every quote I ever got promised me a percentage increase on something. What I wanted was a straight answer to one question: for every dollar I put in, how many come back.”

Illustrative quote — written by Web Tonic to put the results above in an owner’s words. It is not a statement provided by the client.

Fair question, and it is why this page leads with a ratio instead of a growth rate. The conversion action here only started recording partway through the comparison period, so a twelve-month year-over-year claim would be an artifact rather than a result.

No items found.

02 — Our approach

Harvest high-intent demand, then widen it carefully.

The core of the account is intent harvesting done properly: specific engine and fitment searches, structured so that each family of demand can be bid on its own economics rather than averaged into one pot.

Because order values are large and irregular, bidding was managed toward revenue and return rather than cost per conversion, with targets reviewed monthly against actual delivered spend so the account was never left chasing a target it could not reach at volume.

Expansion was deliberate and slow. New coverage was added only where search-term evidence showed real buyer language, and pruned aggressively when it produced clicks without revenue — which in a $3,000-order category is the only expensive mistake available.

03 — What we did

Structure by demand family, bid to revenue, expand on evidence.

Simple account, disciplined execution, honest reporting window.

Honest comparison window

Refused the flattering number

The conversion action started recording in April 2025, so a twelve-month year-over-year figure would compare full tracking against partial tracking. We report absolutes for the year and growth only across the four months both years share.

Drop conversion action history view

Demand-family structure

Each type of engine demand bid on its own economics

Specific engine and fitment searches were separated so that a family with a $4,000 order value was never averaged into the same bidding pot as a low-value part query.

Drop campaign table

Bidding to revenue

Targets reviewed against delivered spend, monthly

With large, irregular order values, cost per conversion is noise. Bidding was managed toward revenue and return, with targets adjusted monthly so the account was never chasing an unreachable goal at volume.

Drop revenue vs spend chart

Evidence-based expansion

Added coverage slowly, pruned it fast

New keyword coverage was justified by search-term evidence and cut quickly when it produced clicks without revenue. In a high-ticket category that is the only genuinely expensive mistake.

Drop search terms report

04 — The results

Twelve months: $1.42M tracked revenue; +90% on matched months.

Period covered: absolute figures Aug 1, 2025 – Jul 31, 2026. Growth figure is Apr–Jul 2026 vs Apr–Jul 2025 — the only months both years report against the same conversion action.

Source: Google Ads API, client account (ID withheld) — a single named conversion action, in USD. The action began recording in April 2025, so no twelve-month year-over-year comparison is claimed.

Content highlights

Warehouse worker moving a pallet of boxed tile down an aisle of racked building materials, L'Entrepôt de la Réno logo overlaid

2026

111,651 → 280,019 clicks

Quebec, Canada

L'Entrepôt de la Réno

Across twelve matched months L'Entrepôt de la Réno's organic search clicks rose 111,651 → 280,019 (+151%) and impressions 4.24M → 10.68M (+152%) — one of the largest organic gains in our portfolio, on a retail catalogue rather than a blog.

Discover more

Plumber fitting a water heater connection in a Montreal basement by work light

2026

30 leads · CA$32.97

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Plomberial

In a deliberately short two-month test, Plomberial's Meta Ads account produced 30 leads at CA$32.97 each on CA$989 of media spend — enough to prove paid social can generate plumbing demand, not enough to call it a trend.

Discover more

Technician clipping heating cable along a snowy roof edge hung with icicles

2026

45 leads · CA$38.53

Quebec, Canada

Fil Chauffant Toiture

Across five reported months Fil Chauffant Toiture's Meta Ads account produced 45 leads at CA$38.53 each on CA$1,734 of media spend, concentrated almost entirely in the pre-winter window.

Discover more

The stack we ran it on

Google Ads

Paid search

GA4

Analytics

Google Tag Manager

Tracking

Google Merchant Center

Feed

Google Search Console

SEO

Ahrefs

SEO

AgencyAnalytics

Reporting

Looker Studio

Dashboards

Over 253x 5-star
reviews

“Web Tonic did in six weeks what our last two agencies couldn't in a year — and for the first time we could see every dollar of it”

Devon Maris

VP Marketing, Klariti

750+ brands
See all Testimonials
See all Testimonials

You like what you are seeing?

See all our Case studies

View all Case studies
View all Case studies
Parent folding clean cloth nappies on a nursery changing table beside a collection tote, Katchoo logo overlaid

2026

CA$11.15 per lead

Greater Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Katchoo

In four reported months Katchoo's Meta Ads account produced 114 leads at CA$11.15 each on CA$1,271 of media spend — a lead cost most local service businesses do not reach in their first year.

Discover more

Specialist examining the stitching of a vintage designer handbag under a task lamp, Her-Age logo overlaid

2026

6.63× tracked ROAS

Italy & international

Her-Age

Over twelve months Her-Age's Google Ads account recorded €235,171 of tracked purchase value on €35,486 of media spend — a 6.63× return. On the seven months that overlap the prior year, tracked value declined, and that is reported below.

Discover more

Book your strategy call today!

{"@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "How JDM Engine Direct turned $97k of search spend into $1.42M", "about": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "JDM Engine Direct"}, "author": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "Web Tonic", "url": "https://www.webtonic.io"}, "publisher": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "Web Tonic", "url": "https://www.webtonic.io"}, "description": "JDM Engine Direct produced 840 tracked conversions and $1,421,603 of revenue on $97,245 of spend over twelve months — a 14.62× return. On the matched months both years cover, revenue grew 90%.", "mainEntityOfPage": "https://www.webtonic.io/case-study/jdm-engine-direct"}